Source: Amnesty
Egypt must uphold freedom of expression and halt prosecution of journalist
The prosecution of an editor for publishing criticism of Egypt’s
President and the Muslim Brotherhood should be halted and freedom of
expression protected, Amnesty International said.
Al-Dostor
editor Islam Afifi is set to stand trial on Thursday before the Giza
Criminal Court in Cairo, reportedly on charges of publishing “false
information” insulting to Egypt’s President Morsi.
“Both the
authorities and the Muslim Brotherhood must accept public criticism of
their positions and actions without trying to hide behind Mubarak-era
laws criminalizing the exercise of the right to freedom of expression,”
said Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui, Amnesty International's Deputy Middle East
and North Africa Director.
“Egypt should uphold its international
obligations and ensure people are not subject to criminal prosecution
for peaceful criticism, even if what they say is perceived to be
offensive.”
Al-Dostor, a daily newspaper and website, came under
investigation by Egypt’s Public Prosecution following complaints over
its criticism of the Muslim Brotherhood. The paper is known for its
editorial stand against the movement, including a June article where
al-Dostor claimed the Muslim Brotherhood was preparing a “massacre” if
Mohamed Morsi lost the country’s presidential election.
An issue
of al-Dostor published on 11 August was confiscated by the authorities
after it claimed the Muslim Brotherhood was trying to establish an
“Islamic state” in Egypt.
President Morsi, who resigned from the
Muslim Brotherhood after he won the election, had publicly warned media
on 9 August against spreading “rumours” that would destabilize Egypt.
“It
is very disappointing that journalists continue to face prosecution in
Egypt for their writing in spite of the ‘25 January Revolution’ and its
hopes for change,” said Amnesty International.
Egypt is a state
party to the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights, which
guarantees the right to freedom of expression.
Amnesty International had called on President Morsi in a June memorandum
to review and repeal provisions of Egyptian law which, under the rule
of Hosni Mubarak and the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (the SCAF),
were frequently used to suppress criticism of the authorities and
public figures.
“The authorities must not fall into the same
pattern of media repression as under Hosni Mubarak and the SCAF and
withstand criticism,” said Amnesty International.
Under Mubarak
and the SCAF, the authorities confiscated newspapers and suspended
television channels. Journalists and public figures criticizing the
authorities were liable to face criminal defamation charges.
Under
the SCAF, Amnesty International documented incidents of army troops and
security forces raiding television studios reporting on crackdowns on
demonstrations, and military prosecutors also summonsed and questioned
journalists and others who publicly criticized the ruling military
council.
The use of criminal defamation charges in Egypt has been
criticised by the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, in its
ruling on an Egyptian blogger in November 2008.
The WGAD said
that charges related to defamation, libel and slander should be dealt
with by the Egyptian authorities under civil, not criminal, law, and
that there should not be prison sentences for such charges.
The
WGAD stated: “The fundamental right to freedom of opinion and
expression, which is the core basis of the human rights system, must
prevail when it implies political criticism, even when this criticism is
focused in the activities of some concrete persons who have assumed
high political responsibilities.”