Monday, April 06, 2009

Afghanistan: Military has too much influence on aid

Much of the international aid to Afghanistan over the past seven years has been spent to achieve military and political objectives, and the current approach to aid lacks “clarity, coherence and resolve”, a group of international NGOs has said.

In a report to the heads of NATO-member states, 11 international NGOs operating in Afghanistan have warned about over-reliance on short-term military gains at the expense of longer-term peace and development.

“There is a need for a truly comprehensive strategy for the long-term reconstruction and stabilisation of Afghanistan,” said the report entitled Caught in the Conflict (subtitled Civilians and the International Security Strategy in Afghanistan), released on 3 April.

To prevent a blurring of the lines between military and humanitarian actors, aid agencies and NATO-led forces agreed on a modus operandi in 2008 [NATO-led forces, aid agencies agree new modus operandi] but this is being largely ignored less than a year after it was signed, the report said.

“We have seen no difference on the ground,” said Matt Waldman, Oxfam’s policy and advocacy manager in Kabul.

The NGOs - including Oxfam, CARE Afghanistan, ActionAid and Save the Children (UK) - are concerned about the growing impact of armed conflict on civilians and the increasing use of aid for military and political gain.

“We feel a pull on our sleeves pulling us to the military tent,” said Dave Hampson, a representative of Save the Children UK, adding that funds for aid agencies were being tied to military and political conditionality more than ever before.

Oxfam commentary

In a commentary on the report Oxfam said:

“The report warns the military are blurring the distinction between aid workers and soldiers by doing extensive humanitarian and assistance work for counter-insurgency purposes, and by using unmarked white vehicles, which are conventionally only used by the UN and aid agencies. This undermines local perceptions of the independence and impartiality of aid agencies and therefore increases the risk to aid workers, and threatens to reduce the areas in which they can safely work.

“The agencies recommend a phase-out of militarised aid and a substantial increase in development and humanitarian funding for civilian institutions and organisations,” it said.

IRIN was unable to get a comment from NATO.

UNAMA report

Over 2,100 civilian Afghans were killed in the conflict in 2008; about 55 percent by various insurgent groups and the rest by pro-government forces, the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) said in a report entitled Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict in 2008.

The UN and rights watchdogs have repeatedly accused the insurgents of deliberate, systematic and widespread attacks on noncombatants and civilian locations.

The NGOs also voiced concern about a significant increase in civilian deaths resulting from aerial strikes by international military forces which were reported to be 552 in 2008; 72 percent higher than 2007, according to the UNAMA report.

Disclaimer:This material comes to you via IRIN, the humanitarian news and analysis service of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations or its Member States.
Photo: Copyright IRIN
Published by Mike Hitchen, Mike Hitchen Consulting
Putting principles before profits